Life Insurance Across Borders: When it works, when it doesn’t

The honest pitch

Life insurance is supposed to do one job: deliver fast, predictable cash to the right people when someone dies.

When it works, it is almost boring. When it fails, it fails in very specific ways: the wrong owner, the wrong beneficiary, the wrong paperwork, the wrong tax treatment, or the wrong compliance profile for the insurer and the bank receiving the funds.

If your life crosses borders, you have to design the policy for cross-border reality, not for a domestic brochure.

Start with what is actually true, not what people repeat

1. In the United States, death benefits are generally not included in the beneficiary’s gross incomeThe IRS says life insurance proceeds paid to a beneficiary due to the insured’s death are generally not includable in gross income; interest paid on top of the proceeds is taxable.

That is income tax. It does not automatically mean “no tax at all.” Estate tax is a different system.

2. In the U.S., life insurance can be included in the insured’s gross estate for estate tax purposes in common situationsRegulations under IRC Section 2042 cover inclusion in the gross estate when proceeds are payable to the estate or when the decedent held “incidents of ownership” in the policy at death.

Translation: even if the beneficiary does not owe income tax on the payout, the policy can still be part of the taxable estate depending on ownership and control.

3. In the UK, whether a policy payout is part of the estate depends heavily on who owns the policy and whether it is held in trustHMRC’s Inheritance Tax Manual notes that where the deceased is the life assured and the policyholder, the proceeds form part of their estate at death. Consumer-facing UK guidance also notes most policies count as part of the estate unless written in trust.

The specific tax outcome depends on facts and current law, but the structural point is accurate: ownership and trust status drive estate inclusion risk.

4. Cross-border claims get slowed by complianceLife insurers are expected to apply customer due diligence and risk-based controls; that can include verifying beneficiaries and related parties.

Translation: if beneficiaries live in higher-friction jurisdictions or have weak documentation, payout speed can drop.

The 6 ways cross-border life insurance breaks

1. The owner is wrongPeople focus on the insured and forget the owner. Owner controls the policy. Ownership drives many tax and estate outcomes, including whether the insured had incidents of ownership.

Typical failure: the insured is also the owner, nobody planned for estate inclusion, and the policy becomes part of estate administration.

2. The beneficiary designations are stale, ambiguous, or legally conflictedCommon disasters:

• ex-spouse still named
• minor children named with no guardian or trust structure
• “my children” named without clarity in blended families
• name mismatch with passports and IDs

Insurers and banks do not resolve family ambiguity quickly. They freeze and request paperwork.

3. The payout goes to the estate, so it drags into probate and timing riskIf proceeds are payable to the estate, you are choosing court timelines. In many systems, probate timing controls everything.

This is one of the reasons many planners try to route proceeds to named beneficiaries or to a trust structure that can receive and distribute, depending on the country and your facts.

4. The policy is “tax clean” but “bank dirty”Even a legitimate payout can get stuck when a receiving bank demands a tight story and documentation, especially under modern AML expectations and beneficial ownership transparency pressure.
5. Currency and transfer friction eats the valueIf the insurer pays in Currency A and the heirs need Currency B in a controlled FX market, you can lose time and money. The policy did its job, then the rails failed.
6. The family thinks insurance replaces a planInsurance is liquidity, not governance. It does not fix messy titles, shareholder disputes, forced heirship conflicts, or unclear authority. It just injects cash into the same messy system.

When cross-border life insurance works well

Use this as your “green light” profile.

• The beneficiary is clearly named, and backups are named
• IDs, address proof, and name consistency are strong
• Ownership is intentionally structured to match your estate plan
• The insurer is reputable and experienced with international beneficiaries
• There is a clear receiving account plan for each beneficiary
• The payout purpose is defined: debt payoff, estate tax liquidity, family support, business continuity

In the U.S. context, it also means you have thought about whether estate inclusion under incidents-of-ownership rules is a feature or a bug.

In the UK context, it means you have thought about whether the policy is part of the estate or held in trust, because that changes both tax exposure and speed.

When it does not work well

This is the “red flag” profile.

• The policyholder/owner role is unclear or accidental
• The estate is the beneficiary “for simplicity”
• Beneficiaries have weak documentation, inconsistent names, or complex residency stories
• Nobody has a claim pack; nobody knows where the policy is
• The family expects payout in one country but the bank account is in another
• The policy is being used to “solve” a governance issue instead of funding a plan

Join Us

The practical framework: the 9 questions you must answer

1. Who owns the policy today?If it is you, be honest about what that implies for estate inclusion and control risk.
2. Who is the beneficiary, and who is the contingent beneficiary?No contingent beneficiary is a self-inflicted delay.
3. Where is the insurer located, and where will the claim be processed?Cross-border servicing capability matters.
4. What currency will the insurer pay in?If heirs need a different currency, plan the conversion and receiving rails now.
5. Does your jurisdiction treat this payout as part of the estate?Example: HMRC guidance indicates policy proceeds may form part of the estate when the deceased is life assured and policyholder.
6. Will beneficiaries face extra reporting or onboarding friction?Insurers apply risk-based diligence, and beneficiaries can be part of that process.
7. What is the purpose of the payout?If it is estate liquidity, business continuity, or mortgage payoff, tie the payout plan to that obligation with clear instructions.
8. Who holds the policy documents and how will they be found fast?A policy that cannot be found is a policy that cannot help.
9. What is the “one-page claim script” for your family?Grief destroys executive function. Give them steps.

Ship asset 1: the cross-border claim pack

Keep this in a secure vault; refresh yearly.

• policy number, insurer contact, broker contact
• certified death certificate process notes
• beneficiary IDs and proof of address
• relationship evidence if needed
• executor/trustee letters if a trust is involved
• payout instructions and receiving bank account details
• one-page “source of funds” explanation for receiving banks
• a list of who to call first, second, third

This reduces delays caused by risk-based diligence and verification requirements.

Ship asset 2: the “works vs doesn’t” checklist

Works when:

• named beneficiaries are current
• ownership is intentional
• claim pack exists
• receiving rails are pre-planned

Doesn’t work when:

• estate is default beneficiary without reason
• documentation is weak
• ownership is accidental
• the policy is being used as a substitute for governance

Bottom line

Life insurance is often the best cross-border liquidity tool because it can be fast and predictable for beneficiaries, and in the U.S. it is generally not income taxable to the beneficiary. But it is not magic. Estate inclusion rules, ownership structure, and compliance friction decide whether the policy behaves like a clean payout or a slow-motion bureaucracy trap.