The new inheritance reality: the paperwork arrives before the condolences
Families still picture inheritance as a family event. A will is read, assets are distributed, life goes on.
But globally mobile wealth does not move that way anymore. It moves through banks, custodians, registries, and reporting systems that treat death as a trigger for risk controls. For high-earning families with assets across borders, inheritance increasingly behaves like a compliance event that happens to a family, not a family event that happens to include compliance.
The shift is not philosophical. It is operational.
When someone dies, institutions do not ask whether the family is ready. They ask for authority, documentation, and proof of who controls what.
And the rules of visibility have tightened.
The OECD’s Consolidated Common Reporting Standard (2025) describes due diligence and reporting procedures and highlights that financial institutions may rely on AML and KYC procedures aligned to FATF Recommendations when determining controlling persons for reporting purposes.t the same time, FATF guidance on beneficial ownership of legal persons emphasizes that systems should support access to adequate, accurate, and up-to-date information on the true owners of companies.
Even if your family never thinks about these frameworks, your banks and counterparties do.
What changed: three forces turning inheritance into compliance
1) The “knowable ownership” era
Many families built legacy structures in an era where ownership details were harder to compile and easier to keep fragmented. That era is ending.
Beneficial ownership concepts are now embedded in onboarding, monitoring, and registry practices. For example, the UK’s People with Significant Control framework requires companies to identify individuals who own or control the company and report them, treating them as beneficial owners in common language.
It is not the only example, but it illustrates the direction: ownership is expected to be declared, maintained, and verifiable.
2) Reporting rails that favor consistency over tradition
CRS-style reporting does not wait for a family meeting. It relies on standardized data: tax residency, controlling persons, and account holder classification. The OECD CRS consolidated text describes how controlling persons are determined and ties that to AML and KYC standards.
This changes the inheritance experience because families often discover their structures are inconsistent only when the estate has to be settled and accounts have to be re-papered.
3) Banks have become inheritance gatekeepers
Banks, custodians, and corporate service providers sit between your plan and your family’s access. Their controls are built to prevent fraud and misdirection, which means they slow or stop movement until authority and identity are proven. In cross-border situations, that often becomes a sequencing problem: documents, translations, authentication, and local format requirements.
The result: even wealthy families can be liquidity constrained at the moment they most need liquidity.
Where informal succession breaks first
Most inheritance failures are not dramatic fraud stories. They are informal habits meeting formal scrutiny.
The “we agreed” problem A founder tells a spouse, “The business is yours if anything happens to me.” The company shares are held personally, there is no shareholder death protocol, and no authorized signatory succession plan. When death occurs, the business can lose decision capacity at exactly the wrong time.
The “family loan” problem Parents make repeated loans or gifts to children, but treat them as casual transfers. No promissory notes, no repayment schedules, no board minutes for related-party transactions. In a compliance environment, undocumented related-party flows invite questions, delays, and in some cases tax recharacterization risk.
The “nominee and convenience” problem A property is held in a relative’s name for convenience. A bank account is opened in one person’s name but used by multiple family members. During life, it works. In death, it can look like misalignment or worse, and institutions default to freezing until clarified.
The “outdated beneficiaries” problem Insurance and investment accounts may pass outside probate if beneficiary designations are correct, current, and accepted by the institution. Many families do not update them after births, divorces, or second marriages. The gap turns into conflict and delay.
These are not rare. They are common.
The compliance cascade families experience after a death
A useful way to understand modern inheritance is to map the cascade.
- Freeze and verify Institutions freeze accounts, or restrict activity, pending proof of authority.
- Identify and align The institution asks who the heirs are, who the legal representative is, who the controlling persons are for any entities, and whether the ownership chain is consistent.
- Document and authenticate Cross-border documents must be certified, often translated, and sometimes authenticated through apostille or legalization.
- Report and reconcile Tax reporting and AML expectations create pressure to reconcile inconsistencies. The family’s “story” must match what institutions can see.
- Distribute and close Only after the above steps do assets begin to move.
The danger is not just time. It is forced decisions. Families sell liquid assets to cover costs while illiquid assets remain stuck. They accept unfavorable terms to gain speed. They fracture in disputes.
The highest performing legacy strategy is not complexity. It is preparedness.
The Legacy Risk Checklist: a defensibility-first approach
This is not legal advice. It is an operational framework families can use to reduce friction and risk.
1) Build a life-to-death asset map
List every meaningful asset with:
- jurisdiction
- title holder
- whether it is held personally or via an entity
- custodian or registry
- access dependencies and likely documents required
If you cannot produce this map quickly, your estate will move slowly.
2) Confirm who has authority in the first 72 hours
The first three days after death are when families realize they do not have signatory authority, access credentials, or clarity on where documents are stored.
Create a simple authority plan:
- who can instruct banks and custodians
- who can access safe storage or document vaults
- who can run payroll or business payments
- who can coordinate counsel across jurisdictions
3) Pressure-test your structures for transparency readiness
Assume beneficial ownership and controlling person information is knowable, requested, and needs to be current.
FATF beneficial ownership guidance emphasizes access to accurate and up-to-date beneficial ownership information. CRS due diligence can rely on AML and KYC procedures aligned with FATF Recommendations when determining controlling persons.
Your plan should be designed to survive those expectations.
4) Create a family transaction policy
Document gifts and loans. Keep records. Use a consistent template. Informality is the enemy of defensibility.
5) Establish an accessible liquidity buffer
Families often have plenty of wealth and not enough accessible cash. Plan for short-term liquidity that does not depend on cross-border probate timelines.
Written by
